Here are the Canon EOS R8 vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark IV and Canon EOS R8 vs. Canon EOS 6D Mark II comparisons. As with all Canon EOS cameras, the R8 imaging sensor has a 3:2 aspect ratio. Optionally (mandatory when using an EF-S lens on the adapter), a 1.6x crop can be selected. Other aspect ratios available are 1:1, 4:3, and 16:9. Watch my follow-up, long-term review of the 5D Mark II: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ga07x8SsANUSUBSCRIBE and like http://fb.com/NorthrupPhotographyBuy the

Tony Northrup's video comparing the R5 and R6 declared the following: * R6 "noticeably" better than the R5 at standard 4K/30 (both low and high ISO) * R6 is equal to the R5 for 4k/30 HQ. * R6 with 4K/30 (HQ Mode) overheats in 39 minutes. * R5 overheats in 22-28 minutes in the comparable 4K HQmode.

I was excited about it. Then I began reading other, more recent, reviews that complained about the camera's inferior dynamic range on various review sites, includeing Peta Pixel and DP Review. This has now given me pause. I must now consider the REFURBISHED 5D Mark III as the price difference between them is about $100.

I waited until all the new cameras were announced but I am now unsure which to move forward with 5D Mark IV or the 5DSr. The camera will mainly be used for landscape photography and the very occasional wildlife. It will be used with 16-35L IS, 24-70 II, 70-300L. The only advantage I see in the 5DSr is the higher resolution. k1T2.
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/888
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/82
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/92
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/895
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/718
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/417
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/541
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/63
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/970
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/967
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/367
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/475
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/977
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/585
  • gfe9i6aq96.pages.dev/925

    • canon 1dx mark ii vs 5d mark iv image quality